Blog

Manual testing is a type of software testing that involves testers executing test cases step-by-step, observing results firsthand, without relying on scripts or automated tools.

Imagine you are designing a new mobile app that will help global users in managing their schedules. You have spent a lot of time designing the features and polishing the design, but you are not sure how intuitive it really is.

As the SaaS and other IT-related markets grow and become more ingrained in the daily operations of businesses and enterprises and the lives of users, the notion of quality becomes even more critical.

25% to 35% of a software testing team’s time is spent on writing and maintaining test cases. Yet, poorly written or incomplete test cases can lead to missed defects, inefficient testing, and costly rework.

Suppose you’re working on a complex software project with a tight deadline. Your team has limited time and resources, but the application is growing in complexity with each sprint. Testing every feature thoroughly is impossible, so how do you decide what to test first?

When a new feature rolls out, the last thing any team wants is to deal with unexpected bugs slipping through testing.

Did you know that the average code coverage across industries falls between 74% to 76%?

Suppose you launch a new app after months of development and find out users complaining about crashes and slow performance. This is every software team’s nightmare in 2025, and exactly what quality assurance (QA) testing is used for.

What can quality assurance (QA) teams expect in 2025? This article will cover what software testing trends QA teams should prepare for to succeed this year.

Former COO of Tricentis and CEO of QASymphony Brings Broad and Deep Experience to the Managed Quality Engineering Company

The deadline is looming, June 28th, 2025, and a lot of companies are keen to tell you how they can help you navigate the new European Union member states’ enforcement of the EAA.

All companies want the best talent. Recruitment has changed significantly over the years, navigating shifts between candidate-led and employer-led markets, tech layoffs, and growing demand for flexibility from candidates.